Tuesday, October 24, 2017

How poor people are losing power in Nepal?

Poor people are losing take from politics and power. Politics has been driven by money. In this capitalist system, the gap between deprived and rich is increasing. Rich are becoming richer and poor are becoming further poorer. The poor people are moving far away from the power and politics. The poor are used only as vote banks and lower level activists to take the richer at top of the power.
The life of politics is election and election has been so much expensive. In Nepal local level election-2017, we saw the candidates spent millions and billions in election campaign. There was competition between them to spend the money and attract the voters to them. Now, the federal and provincial elections are approaching and there will be expenditure of tremendous amount of money again. One without money is unable to get even ticket from their party. The parties are offering tickets to them, who can spend exponentially.
In such a way, the poor are even unable to be candidate for election. It means, the poor and lower class people can never reach on the legislatives and executives. They can select among only the available candidates (the privileged) and ultimately select a rich with a hope that, he will speak and act for them. This is never going to be happened. The winner candidate, who has spent a lot in election campaign will use his power to reimburse the expenditure and make more so that he could win in next election with the money he earns today. In this way, the corruption will be increased. The MPs and Ministers will work for the business men, industrialists, elites and even smugglers to get the fund in election. In this circumstances, can we expect that, our representatives will act for us? No, they will act only for money.
In this capitalist system, money has the power and money has such nature that money attracts money. This is a common proverb. So, like mentioned above, money makes money. Rich becomes richer, because they have the resource to invest. Poor become poorer because they even don't have a seed money for investment. They will be used as low paid workers and only employees, getting very small fraction of profit. Even that earning is spent to purchase basic level commodities and the lower class people become dependent on the higher class people for employment. This dependence increases and the commoners lose the capacity to speak for themselves. So finally the rich captures the resources and power and deprived loses them. This was already explained by Karl Marx a long ago.
The negative side is, even the communists or so called Marxists have ignored this theory. They reached at power after revolution and movements. It is for sure that they have struggled more to change the system. But ultimately, the system has changed them. They have been part of the existing system. They changed the shape of system to create an illusion of change in front of people. But in fact, they have been an inseparable component of existing old system. If we look over the history of political movements in Nepal, we see the root of system hasn't been changed, even though its structure has been changed. Ultimately, the power is with the higher class, higher caste and rich people.
It is nature of money. In this capitalist system, money can buy everything and money makes money.
Friends, the purpose of writing this blog is to express my views towards today's politics of Nepal. Nepalese politics was never for poor people, lower class people. Once Gagan Thapa had said, a son/daughter of a lower class family can involve in politics but only as activists not as leaders. This political system is not for us. This is for the higher class, who are already capturing the resources and power. Existing all major parties won't act for us because to reach on the power, they have to win election, to win election they need money. So, they speak illusively for us but act for the rich because the rich are them, who provide the politicians with money. In this way the election, the politics and all these things are the drama of current political system, which is played to change the characters at power but the roles are still same.

I don't mean to reject this election. Let's use this as a tool and make the deprived candidates win, even though they may be a free candidate or candidate of small party or whatever. Let's not vote for existing major parties. Let's vote for the marginalized candidate not the candidate from so called marginalized community. We know very well, even the reservation of marginalized community has been used by the elites of that community. After all, they are the elites who will reach on power. This election, no vote to elites, vote for a commoner